Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
China Report
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, J.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

I Articles

The Reception of Eighteenth-Century Women's Poetry by Two Male Authors, Yuan Mei (1716–98) and Zhang Xuecheng (1738–1801)

J.D. Schmidt

J.D. Schmidt is at Asian Studies Department, Asian Centre, 1871 West Mall, Vancouver, B.C. V6T122 Canada. E-mail: veryoldhippo{at}gmail.com

The eastward expansion of the Shansabanid sultanate of Ghur in the late twelfth century has usually been depicted as a confrontation between a unitary Muslim self and its Hindu ‘other’. The reification of heterogeneous and protean categories of belief implicit in this paradigm is particularly ill suited to represent the dynamic religious life of mediaeval Ghur. This was characterised by shifting patterns of royal patronage that reflect intense competition between the Karramiya, a popular pietistic sect, and the orthodox Sunni madhhabs. Drawing on Ghurid architectural and numismatic inscriptions, this article examines the ways in which contemporary doctrinal disputes inflected elite cultural production during the period. Based on the content and context of QurTManic citations, it suggests that a rhetorical emphasis on idolatryand unbelief in Ghurid epigraphy was part of a contemporary intra-Sunni polemic, and notprimarily an address to those who were literally outside the fold of Islam. The deploymentof scripture in the service of sectarian rivalry has significant implications for the inter-pretation of QurTManic epigraphy in Indo-Ghurid mosques such as the Quwwat al-Islam

China Report, Vol. 44, No. 1, 1-21 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/000944550704400101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?